Systematic Literature Review
Systematic Literature Review (SLR) can be seen as a step ahead taken in literature review. It also searches, identifies, selects and then analyses the existing literature to answer the questions raised in the current research work. However, the critical approach is enhanced in a systematic approach to fulfill the purpose of providing better credibility and clarity. This rigorous process does not just involve finding the accurate literature for the study but also strategically planning the methods of collecting those studies. The criteria and approach of your study also remain the focal point while conducting the SLR, as it is done with the purpose to improve the existing knowledge about the discoveries in the topic area, to evaluate the research methodologies that have been used earlier and to come up with better theories and analysis.
Our Key Principles
Transparency
Systematic Literature Review uses methods of search like PRISMA, RevMan and other thoroughly critical measures to make sure that only the most relevant literature studies are selected for the review. It enables the screening and selection of the studies. Also, it keeps the strategy transparent and does multiple analyses to make sure that the selected studies stand strongly for the review base.
Understandable
SLR provides a summary of the existing knowledge on the topic that was compiled through various studies and puts it in simpler terms for the readers to understand it. It also helps in giving the support to the current study, so that the purpose and goals of the research become clearer.
Planned Stages
The focus in Systematic Literature review remains on the stages through which the studies need to pass and qualify for the final review. For this it is important to first define the concept and theory of the current study and the specific issues which have been raised to sort them all out one by one.
Validity
The data and existing studies get collected from scientific sources, journals and books which are available either online or offline. Web of Science, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, PunMed, PsychINFO and so on are some of the sources which provide studies which are peer reviewed making them more reliable and factual.
Auditable
Due to the systemic approach and transparency in the methods used to select, define and analyse the studies, the process of conducting the research becomes explicit. This allows the future researchers to understand how the results and conclusions have been derived from the given data easily which makes it easier for them to evaluate and audit, where and when necessary.
Futuristic
By defining the issues and compiling all the existing knowledge regarding the research topic, SLR also makes it possible to identify the gaps in the research and data studied during the current study. This allows in raising questions and making justifiable suggestions for the future progress in the field with supported and well-reasoned review.
Request a Quote
PhD candidates can meet PhD consultant, editors for discussion related to doctoral research and journal paper publications including SCI, UGC approved and IEEE journals.
Book Your SeatFrequently Asked Questions
Quick Links
Information
CONTACT DETAILS
- 022 4896 4199 (20 Lines)
- 0091 93102 29971
- helpdesk1@mail.phdguidance.org
- Copyright © 2008-2024 PhD Guidance
All Rights Reserved. 